Pension Notes
April 2003

Pension Action Center
Gerontology Institute
University of Massachusetts Boston

Project’s Persistence Helps Others Besides Its Own Client

Some of the cases handled by the New England Pension Assistance Project are less important for the amount of money involved than for the principle that retired workers ought to get whatever money is due to them.

In one recent case, the Project is proud of having obtained a modest level of past-due payments, not only for its original client but also for at least two dozen other former employees of the same now-bankrupt firm.

The client was referred in 2000 by the U.S. Department of Labor, which often refers difficult cases to the Pension Project.  The 71-year-old client had been trying since 1995 to collect his money from the profit-sharing plan of a company that had employed him for several years in the early 1990s.

Profit-sharing plans are not covered by the federal Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation (PBGC), which is a payer of last resort for certain types of pension plans.  However, ERISA, the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, requires that profit-sharing funds be set aside and shielded from any bankruptcy proceeding.

“A Stone Wall”

At first, says Jack Pizer, coordinator of Massachusetts cases for the Pension Project, “we ran into a stone wall.  We couldn’t go to PBGC, and we couldn’t find the administrator of the profit-sharing plan.”

Renee Summers, the Pension Project volunteer assigned to the case, persisted through a seemingly unending series of obstacles.  Once she was finally able to locate the third-party payer who held the funds, she found that this company was not authorized to actually pay out any money.  Moreover, the Project’s client was not even on the list of those who were eligible to collect.

Eventually, Summers and the client were able to document his eligibility.  Still, his money (and that of about forty others) seemed to be locked up.  The solution came from Attorney Gail Simon, who had recently offered to volunteer for the Project.  (She had seen the Project’s name in a list of pro bono opportunities maintained by the Massachusetts Bar Association.)

Once she learned the details of the case,   Simon devised a plan by which the third-party payer could legally be authorized to disburse the funds.

Helping the Others

The Project’s client collected his money in July 2002.  But that left the other former employees out in the cold.  “None of these people even knew about this,” Pizer says.  Instead of considering the case closed, Summers arranged for the others to be notified, even finding new addresses for a number of those whose letters came back marked “Addressee Unknown.”

Of those who responded to a follow-up letter, 26 of the former employees had received payments.  The actual amounts were not huge – they have come to a littleover $20,000 total – but it is money that would never have been received without the Project’s work.
 

Project’s Work Adds Up

·        2,800 workers and retirees helped

·        $12.6 million in benefits recovered

“I’m very, very thankful for Renee’s persistence in this case,” Pizer says.  “It finally came to fruition.”

Copyright © 2002 Pension Action Center
Send mail to webmaster@pensionaction.org with questions or comments about this web site.
Last modified: April 25, 2008